Homeland Security?

0
553

300px-M113_Iraq_1st_Armored_Division1

Forbes: “The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice. It confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. As reported elsewhere, some of this purchase order is for hollow-point rounds, forbidden by international law for use in war, along with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month. Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years. In America.”

dhs_bullets-340x161

Opinion: Finally, a mainstream publication is asking questions. This is our 18th post on this subject, but so far it has been hard to find a national discussion or any government explanation.

Back in December, 2011 we posted this: “When candidate Obama was running for office he said: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Candidate Barack Obama, July 2008

Why would the US need a heavily armed civilian force?  When a global leader (anti-Christ) comes along to save the world’s economies, he will need controls that are already in place, since he will only have 7 years to accomplish his evil agenda. FEMA camps and a  heavily armed civilian army would be necessary tools to establish global control of citizens.

 “To disarm the people… was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” George Mason June 14, 1788