Yes, There IS Evidence Linking al Qaeda to Benghazi


1388350874142_cachedThe Daily Beast: “Libyan militants tell the New York Times that al Qaeda is not behind the 2012 Benghazi attack. Some members of Congress beg to differ.

On Sunday, The New York Times published an investigation that concluded al Qaeda played no role in the September 11, 2012 attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi. For Democrats, this was welcome news considering the bruising investigations into the attack from Republicans in Congress. The piece was trumpeted by the progressive non-profit, Media Matters in a blast email as “bad news for Benghazi Hoaxers.”

But two members of the House intelligence committee, Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Adam Schiff, told Fox News on Sunday that U.S. intelligence assessments concluded al Qaeda did play a role in the attack.”

Opinion: This weekend an email was sent by the DNC to Obama supporters, imploring them to contribute to the DNC’s 2014 efforts to avoid the possibility of impeaching the President for one of his numerous instances of presidential misconduct.

It is a given that the NYT’s article denying al Qaeda’s involvement in the murder of a US ambassador and three diplomats was timed to support the email.

Nice try.

Lies and deception are the hallmarks of this administration and the mainstream media that supports them. The real Benghazi story may never see the light of day. Where was the president that night? Where was Hillary that night? And who in the administration concocted the cover-up?

Benghazi  makes Watergate look like a petty burglary and a fib. Watergate ended in the resignation of a president.

Benghazi didn’t even stop another president from getting reelected.

Things have have definitely changed.